data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fc8d/8fc8d2ffceed5683aed9bcd939c1ce8719ab4552" alt=""
What We’re Talking About
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7de25/7de25d27bf3afd10b2b4cf49e1cc669695b9b42d" alt="Supreme Court Drops Bombshell Opinion in Jack Daniel’s Dispute"
Supreme Court Drops Bombshell Opinion in Jack Daniel’s Dispute
In a shocking twist on Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Jack Daniel’s, vacating the Ninth Circuit’s holding that a squeaky dog toy resembling the iconic whiskey bottle is an expressive work protected by the First Amendment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16437/16437110ab3a25fe02fcea141ccc11c58d9d8b79" alt="Jack Daniels and the Dog Toy Drama"
Jack Daniels and the Dog Toy Drama
Imagine you are shopping for a new toy for your furry companion. You find a whisky-bottle-shaped squeaky toy with what looks a lot like a Jack Daniels Label and the name “Bad Spaniels.” At first glance, would you assume that Jack Daniels made the toy - or would parody and mimicry come to mind?